Intellectual Property

A new federal recommendation could hinder innovations from biotechnology R&D by limiting gene patents and licenses.

The folks at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are trying to remedy the slow process of patent processing by erasing redundancies and increasing efficiency through various methods, all discussed — but not solved — at a recent roundtable held at USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Va.

A patent case winding its way through U.S. District Court has the potential to hinder biotechnology R&D if the judge hearing the case rules in favor of the plaintiffs, led by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The purpose of this survey was to examine the extent and importance of technology transfer and licensing activity involving biotechnology companies.

We have used the biological processes of microorganisms for 6,000 years to make useful food products, such as bread and cheese, and to preserve dairy products.

Today, the biotechnology industry is enjoying more success and influence than ever before. Our industry’s innovations continue to improve the lives of people worldwide, and the advancement of these innovations is supported by the work of BIO.

Economists have long recognized that the development and spread of economic innovations are the most powerful factors affecting how fast the U.S. economy grows and how much the incomes of most Americans will rise.

Certain groups are calling for serious overhaul of the nation‟s patent system.

Letters, Testimony & Comments

February 8 2016
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the 2016 Special 301 Submission. 
December 15 2015
The Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) greatly appreciates the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions of the stakeholders on the Draft Patents (Amendment) Rules 2015 published by the Ministry of Commerce & Industry.
October 29 2015
The Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) appreciates this opportunity to submit comments on the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) July 2015 Update on Subject Matter Eligibility (Guidance).
July 27 2015
A coalition of 79 house members have requested significant improvement upon language within H.R. 9, the Innovation Act, in order to preserve the effectiveness of Hatch-Waxman and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
April 14 2015
Dear Chairmen Grassley and Goodlatte and Ranking Members Leahy and Conyers, We write as leading agricultural companies and producer organizations to urge caution as the Congress considers changes to the U.S. patent system. There is a concern that the Innovation Act, as currently drafted, will discourage investment in modern agricultural tools important to rural America by making patent rights more difficult to enforce and more challenging for companies and universities to cross-license agricultural technologies.

Press Releases

September 28 2015
"It is disappointing that the PTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) failed to properly assess the important issues raised by this motion. This cursory and erroneous ruling reinforces the immediate need for Congress and the PTO leadership to take clear and decisive action to prevent any further misuse and abuse of the Inter Partes Review process by hedge funds, extortionists and other questionable entities seeking to undermine it for their own financial benefit." 
September 3 2015
The Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) today released the following statement regarding the recent IPR challenges filed by hedge fund manager Kyle Bass.
August 25 2015
BIO released the following statement on the decision by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office rejecting challenges to two patents held by Acorda Therapeutics...
August 20 2015
BIO issued a statement regarding the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) proposed changes to the rules governing the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes review (IPR) proceedings...
April 15 2015
BIO supports the efforts of the House Judiciary Committee to curb abuse of the patent system by those seeking to use the system for personal financial gain rather than to promote innovation. However, we are concerned that H.R. 9, the Innovation Act of 2015, goes beyond targeting abusive practices, including with respect to its excessive pleading requirements, mandatory stays of discovery, and mechanisms for joinder of third-party investors, licensors, and collaborators in all patent-related cases.