WASHINGTON, D.C. (Tuesday, January 12, 2010) - California’s cap-and-trade regulations should recognize that using biomass for biofuels is carbon neutral and does not contribute to global warming. The Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) yesterday submitted comments to the California Air Resources Board on its preliminary draft regulation for the state’s Cap-and-Trade Program, which is scheduled for implementation in 2011.
“California’s draft regulation implicitly recognizes that biomass used for power generation recycles atmospheric carbon, resulting in no net carbon emissions. California should ensure that its final regulation consistently applies this rule to all fuels, including liquid transportation biofuels,” stated Brent Erickson, executive vice president of BIO’s Industrial & Environmental Section. “Put simply, a ton of carbon emissions is a ton, and California should not favor or penalize any obligated party through inconsistent treatment of greenhouse gas emissions.”
“Only one option being considered by California in its preliminary draft regulation would apply a consistent accounting of carbon emissions, using common methodology for all industries, including electricity generation, transportation fuels, and other industrial processes,” Erickson continued. “Treating the sectors differently would undermine the ability of obligated parties to reduce the state’s greenhouse gas emissions at costs acceptable to consumers and drivers. Under any cap-and-trade system, lifecycle emission estimates would be directly monetized. Lifecycle emissions are not applied in the accounting for biomass used in electricity generation; to incorporate them for biofuels would unfairly incentivize one form of energy production over another.”
BIO specifically commented on the inclusion of indirect land use change estimates for biofuels under the cap-and-trade regulation, noting that it is already counted in California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard.
Erickson continued, “Regulatory double jeopardy risks suffocating California’s position in the development of advanced biofuels. Experts and regulatory authorities have not agreed upon a standardized methodology for calculating emissions from indirect land use. California’s draft regulations for the cap-and-trade system should not single out biofuels for inclusion of indirect effects.”
BIO’s comments can be viewed at http://bio.org/letters/.
Upcoming BIO Events
7th Annual BIO Asia International Partnering Conference
January 25-26, 2010
12th Annual BIO CEO & Investor Conference
February 8-9, 2010
New York, NY
9th Annual BIO Windhover & Pharmaceutical Strategic Outlook
February 23-25, 2010
New York City, NY
March 8-10, 2010
BIO Intellectual Property Counsels Spring Conference and Committee Meeting
April 19-21, 2010
New Orleans, LA
Partnering for Global Health
May 3, 2010
McCormick Place Convention Center
BIO International Convention
May 3-6, 2010
McCormick Place Convention Center
2010 BIO Human Resources Conference
May 4-7, 2010
BIO represents more than 1,200 biotechnology companies, academic institutions, state biotechnology centers and related organizations across the United States and in more than 30 other nations. BIO members are involved in the research and development of innovative healthcare, agricultural, industrial and environmental biotechnology products. BIO also produces the BIO International Convention, the world’s largest gathering of the biotechnology industry, along with industry-leading investor and partnering meetings held around the world.