COVID-19 has highlighted the need for innovation and resilience, but our regulatory system for animal biotech has held us back, argues an op-ed in Agri-Pulse.
America’s “regulatory system for animal agriculture—specifically animal biotechnology—has not kept pace with science,” says Ryan F. Quarles, Kentucky’s Agriculture Commissioner and President of the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA), in Agri-Pulse.
This could have serious consequences for the economy. As one example, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS), a viral disease that causes reproductive failure and death in pigs, costs the U.S. pork industry upwards of $664 million annually, while outbreaks of African swine fever and avian flu could have similar impacts.
Animal biotechnology could help. Innovations like gene editing could make pigs resistant to these diseases.
But “breakthroughs are being held back by an awkward and unworkable regulatory system,” explains Quarles. “There is no way to know how long it will take, or how much it will cost before products are approved for market.”
So, what kind of system do we need? Instead of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulating animals like “drugs,” animal biotech should be overseen by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) which has “expertise in food production,” he continues.
The bottom line: “We need policies that will redefine agriculture toward a healthy and resilient world. Innovation is essential to making that goal a reality,” he concludes. We agree.
Learn more about how One Health policies could help us respond to zoonotic disease outbreaks.
More Ag & Environment News:
FDA: FDA Releases New "Feed Your Mind" Consumer Education Materials
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has posted additional consumer educational materials for "Feed Your Mind," an initiative to provide science-based information on genetically modified foods, commonly called GMOs or genetically modified organisms.